funny


Subfloptimal (n): pertaining to a point so insignificant, that the time lost in debate outweighs the potential benefit/cost of any outcome in consideration.

Suppose you’re about to drive to a concert with some friends. Friend A suggests a shortcut. Friend B suggests a different shortcut. Letting friends A and B argue about their shortcuts for five minutes is subfloptimal, because while one shortcut may indeed be better than the other, the time spent arguing is going to slow you down more than just choosing a path and going.

This comes up a lot in software projects. Someone will suggest we rename all our floobs and, instead, call them zorts. You might think “hey, there are good reasons we called them floobs” but if you can tolerate “zorts” without worrying much, the distinction is subfloptimal. It’s easier to just make the change than to argue about it, as long as you’re not one of those people who finds it offensive to call something a zort.

In which case you can go zort yourself.

In a conversation with the Count, I learned a new word:

habernasher (n): one who is in the habit of eating men’s clothing.

Don’t ask. But feel free to suggest your own new made up words!

If you haven't seen Savage Chickens yet, you probably want to have a look. Cartoons featuring chickens drawn on post-it notes. Hilarious.

Finally, a unified theory of everything.

link

OK, I'm not really going to publish a favorite footnote every week. But if I did, this one on David Weinberger's blog would be it:

*For the moment we're pretending that telecommunication services are offered in a free market. Haha.

Brookline by Jonathan Coulton.

Now I'm rich and smart,
my home is charming.
Sense of irony well-honed.
I buy used books and Britas,
I snack on nuts and wine.
I have been imprisoned in Brookline.

Listen to the mp3 and read the lyrics.

A friend of mine who is getting married asked for some advice about changing (or not changing) her name. Here is my take on it, with names changed to protect the innocent. The couple shall herein be known as Emilia Gambino and Lucas Gustaffson.


As interbreeding becomes the norm, we should expect family names to increasingly lose their ethnic significance. In a couple of generations, people will find it so much harder to pin their family tree to a specific country, and there will probably be redheaded brown-skinned people named Gambino (who knows?). So, at least on a theoretical level, I think we should bite the bullet now and give up on the historical/ethnic significance of last names.

Given that, what good is a last name?

  • helps to uniquely identify a person
  • identifies membership in a family group
  • very frequently associated with an individual bearing it

In other words, your last name is a huge branding opportunity. As it is used for identification, frequently associated with the people it includes, and denotes group membership, it is not at all unlike a company name. I am not kidding.

What does one want in a company name? Well, it has to be unique. You'd never call a new company or a new family "Smith". Second, you have to be able to register a sensible domain name; that's why my Rura is so convenient, because it's short and phonetically reasonable, yet unusual enough to have been available in y2k. Your name should be easy to say and spell (perhaps easier than "Rura", but I'm still thankful family names pass partilineally and I don't have an 8:2 consonant:vowel ratio in my last name). Finally, it can be used to communicate part of the mission or culture of the group (e.g. Microsoft, New Balance) but it needn't do so (e.g. GoDaddy, Nike). This last exception is especially important in the case of something as long-lasting and non-goal-specific as a family name.

Note also that in family names, there is a small, probably temporary incentive to use certain traditional-sounding names if you live in the United States or Canada and desire admission for your children to elite colleges. If your child's last name is distinctly Hispanic, it may trigger poorly calibrated affirmative action features in the college admissions process. For this reason, you should consider changing your names to "Emilia Rodriguez" or "Lucas Hernandez". However, a child named LaKeysha Rodriguez-Hernandez might be unduly scrutinized for her uncanny combination of affirmative-action-triggering name archetypes with the characteristically yuppie hyphen, so beware.

Short-term admissions strategizing aside, I recommend that you invent a new family name and use it for yourselves and your children. You might consider something that blends "Gustaffson" and "Gambino", such as "Gambison" or "Gusbino". However, if you are serious about achieving a lasting brand for your family, it may be worth bringing in a full-fledged naming/branding agency. While these guys mostly sit around thinking of names like "Verizon", there is no reason they couldn't expand into family names. In fact, the idea may be novel enough that an agency might be happy to donate their services if you let them write a few press releases about it. Just imagine the envy of the "Joneses" when their Tommy has his first play date with your young Mr. Campione or the way boys will melt for the on-demand attractiveness of Ms. SeducTiVo.

link

How many of Shimon's friends does it take to fold a shirt?

link

link

Um, this is weird.

Next Page »